The IRS has released much-anticipated temporary and proposed regulations on the capitalization of costs incurred for tangible property. They impact how virtually any business writes off costs that repair, maintain, improve or replace any tangible property used in the business, from office furniture to roof repairs to photocopy maintenance and everything in between. They apply immediately, to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
The IRS has released much-anticipated temporary and proposed regulations on the capitalization of costs incurred for tangible property. They impact how virtually any business writes off costs that repair, maintain, improve or replace any tangible property used in the business, from office furniture to roof repairs to photocopy maintenance and everything in between. They apply immediately, to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
These so-called “repair regulations” are broad and comprehensive. They apply not only to repairs, but to the capitalization of amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property. They are intended to clarify and expand existing regulations, set out some bright-line tests, and provide some safe harbors for deducting payments.
The regulations are an ambitious effort to address capitalization of specific expenses associated with tangible property. The regulations affect manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, and retailers—everyone who uses tangible property, whether the property is owned or leased. The rules provide a more defined framework for determining capital expenditures.
Most taxpayers will have to make changes to their method of accounting to comply with the temporary regulations and will need to file Form 3115. Taxpayers who filed for a change of accounting method following the issuance of the 2008 proposed regulations will probably have to change their accounting method again.
The IRS has promised to issue two revenue procedures that will provide transition rules for taxpayers changing their method of accounting, including the granting of automatic consent to make the change. The regulations require taxpayers to make a Code Sec. 481(a) adjustment; this means that taxpayers will have to apply the regulations to costs incurred both prior to and after the effective date of the regulations.
The new regulations provide rules for materials and supplies that can be deducted, rather than capitalized. The rules provide several methods of accounting for rotable and temporary spare parts, and allow taxpayers to apply a de minimis rule so that they can deduct materials and supplies when they are purchased, not when they are consumed.
Costs to acquire, produce or improve tangible property must be capitalized. The regulations address moving and reinstallation costs, work performed prior to placing property into service, and transaction costs. Generally, costs of simply removing property can be deducted, but costs of moving and then reinstalling property may have to be capitalized.
To determine whether a cost incurred for property is an improvement, it is necessary to determine the unit of property. Generally, the larger the unit of property, the easier it is to deduct expenses, rather than have to capitalize them. The regulations provide detailed rules for determining the unit of property for buildings and for non-building tangible property. For buildings, the IRS identified eight component systems as separate units of property, requiring more costs to be capitalized. However, the new rules also provide for deducting the costs of property taken out of service, by treating the retirement as a disposition.
The new regulations require virtually every business to review how repairs, maintenance, improvements and replacements are handled for tax purposes, with both mandatory and optional adjustments made to past treatment as appropriate.
Please feel free to call this office for a more targeted explanation of how these new regulations impact your business operations.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The fate of the employee-side payroll tax cut along with a host of tax extenders and other expired provisions could be decided in coming weeks. A conference committee of House and Senate members is negotiating a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut and could add some or all of the tax extenders to a final package. Lawmakers also could extend the payroll tax cut without acting on any tax incentives.
The fate of the employee-side payroll tax cut along with a host of tax extenders and other expired provisions could be decided in coming weeks. A conference committee of House and Senate members is negotiating a full-year extension of the payroll tax cut and could add some or all of the tax extenders to a final package. Lawmakers also could extend the payroll tax cut without acting on any tax incentives.
Payroll tax cut
The Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 extended the employee-side OASDI tax cut through the end of February 2012. The employee-share of OASDI taxes is 4.2 percent for the two-month period, rather than 6.2 percent. The employer-share of OASDI taxes remains at 6.2 percent for the two month period. Self-employed individuals also benefit from a two percentage point reduction in OASDI taxes.
Unless extended, the employee-share of OASDI taxes is scheduled to revert to 6.2 percent after February 29, 2012. The White House and the leaders of the two parties in Congress agree that the payroll tax cut should be extended a full-year. They disagree, however, how to pay for the extension; even if it should be paid for at all.
Congress could extend the two-month payroll tax cut through the end of 2012 without paying for it. The 2011 payroll tax cut was unfunded. Congress appropriated to the Social Security trust funds amounts equal to the reduction in payroll tax revenues. The 2011 payroll tax cut was estimated by the Congressional Budget Office cost approximately $111 billion. Extending it through the end of 2012 is estimated to cost just as much if not more.
House Republicans reportedly have proposed a number of revenue raisers to offset the cost of extending the payroll tax cut through the end of 2012. One GOP proposal would extend the current pay freeze for employees of the federal government. Another GOP proposal would require higher-income individuals to pay increased Medicare premiums.
One possible revenue raiser, increasingly under discussion by Democrats, is a change in the taxation of so-called carried interest. Current law generally taxes carried interest as capital gains and not as ordinary income. Past efforts to change the tax treatment of carried interest have failed to pass Congress.
Extenders
The so-called tax extenders, popular but temporary tax provisions, expired at the end of 2011. Many taxpayers are surprised to learn that their particular tax break, whether it be the state or local sales tax deduction, the teachers’ classroom expense deduction, or the research tax credit, are temporary. The extenders have been routinely revived many times in the past. This year, however, could be different. Faced with record federal budget deficits, lawmakers may decide to extend only some of the expired provisions.
President Obama’s FY 2013 proposals
President Obama is expected to release his fiscal year (FY) 2013 federal budget proposals in early February, which will reignite debate over the Bush-era tax cuts. President Obama is expected to urge Congress to allow the Bush-era tax cuts to expire after 2012 for higher-income taxpayers, which President Obama defines as individuals earning more than $200,000 or families earning more than $250,000. In recent weeks, there has been speculation that President Obama may revisit those definitions in his FY 2013 budget, possibly raising the amounts.
Few Capitol Hill observers expect Congress to take any action on the Bush-era tax cuts before the November elections. Instead, Congress may take up some of President Obama’s other proposals. As in past budgets, President Obama will likely propose to extend some energy tax breaks for individuals and businesses, extend tax incentives for education and provide some targeted-tax breaks to businesses. President Obama has also promised to introduce proposals to encourage U.S. companies to “insource” jobs at home.
On some issues, such as energy and education, lawmakers may find common ground but negotiations are likely to go down to the wire. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
If you have any questions about the payroll tax cut, tax extenders or the various tax proposals under discussion, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The IRS reopened its offshore voluntary disclosure program in early 2012 in response to what the government described as strong interest among taxpayers. The reopened program, the third of its type in recent years, encourages taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts to make full disclosures in exchange for a reduced penalty framework. Like its predecessors, the terms and conditions of the reopened program are very complex. The IRS has promised to provide more details. In the meantime, the prior offshore disclosure programs are guides to how the IRS intends to implement the third, reopened program.
The IRS reopened its offshore voluntary disclosure program in early 2012 in response to what the government described as strong interest among taxpayers. The reopened program, the third of its type in recent years, encourages taxpayers with unreported foreign accounts to make full disclosures in exchange for a reduced penalty framework. Like its predecessors, the terms and conditions of the reopened program are very complex. The IRS has promised to provide more details. In the meantime, the prior offshore disclosure programs are guides to how the IRS intends to implement the third, reopened program.
Previous disclosure programs
The IRS launched two previous offshore disclosure initiatives: one in 2009 and another in 2011. Both programs offered reduced penalties in exchange for full disclosure. In early 2012, the IRS reported it received 33,000 voluntary disclosures from the 2009 and 2011 offshore initiatives. The government has collected over $4.4 billion from the 2009 and 2011 programs. The IRS predicted it will collect more revenue as it continues to work cases.
Reopened program
The reopened program operates very similarly to the 2009 and 2011 programs but with some key differences. The previous programs were temporary. The 2011 program ended in mid-September 2011. The reopened program has no set end date. The IRS cautioned, however, that it could close the program at some future date. The decision to end the program is solely at the discretion of the IRS.
The reopened program requires taxpayers to file all original and amended tax returns and include payment for back-taxes and interest for up to eight years as well as pay accuracy-related and/or delinquency penalties. Additionally, taxpayers must pay a penalty of 27.5 percent of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities or value of foreign assets during the eight full tax years prior to the disclosure. In comparison, the highest penalty in the 2011 program was 25 percent. IRS officials have said that the penalty was increased because the agency does not want to reward taxpayers who did not participate in the 2009 or 2011 disclosure programs because they anticipated that a future penalty would be lower.
In limited circumstances, taxpayers may qualify for a 12.5 percent penalty or a five percent penalty. Generally, taxpayers whose offshore accounts or assets did not surpass $75,000 in any calendar year may qualify for the 12.5 percent penalty.
The requirements for the five percent penalty are very narrow. The IRS has explained that taxpayers must meet four conditions: (1) The taxpayer did not open or cause the account to be opened; (2) the taxpayer exercised minimal, infrequent contact with the account, for example, to request the account balance, or update account holder information such as a change in address, contact person, or email address; (3) except for a withdrawal closing the account and transferring the funds to an account in the United States, the taxpayer did not withdraw more than $1,000 from the account in any year for which the taxpayer was non-compliant; and (4) the taxpayer can show that all applicable U.S. taxes have been paid on funds deposited to the account (only account earnings have escaped U.S. taxation).
The penalty amounts in the reopened program are not set in stone, the IRS cautioned. It may eventually increase penalties in the program for all or some taxpayers or defined classes of taxpayers.
Quiet disclosures
One goal of the three programs is to caution taxpayers against so-called “quiet disclosures.” A quiet disclosure occurs when a taxpayer files an amended return and pays any tax delinquency without making a formal voluntary disclosure. The IRS warned taxpayers making quiet disclosures that they risked being sanctioned to the fullest extent allowed by law.
Critics
The offshore disclosure programs were not without their critics. The National Taxpayer Advocate recently told Congress that the IRS should streamline what is a very complicated process. The National Taxpayer Advocate also reported that IRS examiners were assuming that all violations were willful unless a taxpayer presented evidence to the contrary. It is possible that the IRS may revisit some of the terms and conditions of the reopened program in light of the National Taxpayer Advocate’s report.
If you have any questions about the reopened offshore voluntary disclosure program, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Taxpayers with children should be aware of the numerous tax breaks for which they may qualify. Among them are: the dependency exemption, child tax credit, child care credit, and adoption credit. As they get older, education tax credits for higher education may be available; as is a new tax code requirement for employer-sponsored health care to cover young adults up to age 26. Employers of parents with young children may also qualify for the child care assistance credit.
Taxpayers with children should be aware of the numerous tax breaks for which they may qualify. Among them are: the dependency exemption, child tax credit, child care credit, and adoption credit. As they get older, education tax credits for higher education may be available; as is a new tax code requirement for employer-sponsored health care to cover young adults up to age 26. Employers of parents with young children may also qualify for the child care assistance credit.
Dependency Exemption
In addition to the personal exemption an individual taxpayer may take for him or herself to reduce taxable income (Line 42 on Form 1040), that taxpayer may also take an exemption for each qualifying dependent who has lived with the taxpayer for more than half of the tax year. A dependent may be a natural child, step-child, step-sibling, half-sibling, adopted child, eligible foster child, or grandchild, and generally must be under age 19, a full-time student under age 24, or have special needs. The amount of the exemption is the same as the taxpayer’s personal exemption, $3,700 for the 2011 tax year and $3,800 for the 2012 tax year.
Child Tax Credit
Parents of children who are under age 17 at the end of the tax year may qualify for a refundable $1,000 tax credit. The credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction of tax liability, and may be listed on Line 51 of Form 1040. For every $1,000 of adjusted gross income above the threshold limit ($110,000 for married joint filers; $75,000 for single filers), the amount of the credit decreases by $50.
Child and Dependent Care Credit
If a taxpayer must pay for childcare for a child under age 13 in order to pursue or maintain gainful employment, he or she may claim up to $3,000 of his or her eligible expenses for dependent care. If one parent stays home full-time, however, no child care costs are eligible for the credit.
Adoption Credit
Taxpayers who have incurred qualified adoption expenses in 2011 may claim either a $13,360 credit against tax owed or a $13,360 income exclusion if the taxpayer has received payments or reimbursements from his or her employer for adoption expenses. For 2012, the amount of the credit will decrease to $12,650, and in 2013 to $5,000.
Higher Education Credits
There are two education-related credits available for 2012: the American Opportunity credit and the lifetime learning credit. The American Opportunity credit amount is the sum of 100 percent of the first $2,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses plus 25 percent of the next $2,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses, for a total maximum credit of $2,500 per eligible student per year. The credit is available for the first four years of a student's post-secondary education. The credit amount phases out ratably for taxpayers with modified AGI between $80,000 and $90,000 ($160,000 and $180,000 for joint filers). The lifetime learning credit is equal to 20 percent of the amount of qualified tuition expenses paid on the first $10,000 of tuition per family. The phaseout for 2012 ranges from $52,000 to $62,000 ($104,000 to $124,000 for joint filers). Parents also find tax relief in saving for college though Coverdell accounts, section 529 plans and specified U.S.. savings bonds.
Extended Health Care Coverage
Effective since September 23, 2010, the new health care law requires plans to provide coverage for children until they attain age 26. Further, effective on or after March 30, 2010, children under the age of 27 are considered dependents of a taxpayer for purposes of the general exclusion from income for reimbursements for medical care expenses of an employee, spouse, and dependents under an employer-provided accident or health plan. Therefore, a plan must provide coverage to a child who is still a dependent up to age 26; but can do so up to age 27 without income tax consequences. A child includes a son, daughter, stepson, or stepdaughter of the taxpayer; a foster child placed with the taxpayer by an authorized placement agency or by judgment, decree, or other order of any court of competent jurisdiction; and a legally adopted child of the taxpayer or a child who has been lawfully placed with the taxpayer for legal adoption.
Child Care Assistance Credit (for businesses)
Employers may take up to $150,000 of the eligible costs of providing employees with child care assistance as tax credit. These costs may include a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, improving, and operating a child care facility.
If you have any questions about these provisions and how they may benefit you, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The Treasury Department is authorized to offset a taxpayer’s tax refund to satisfy certain debts. A spouse who believes that his or her portion of the refund should not be used to offset the debt that the other spouse owes may request a refund from the IRS.
The Treasury Department is authorized to offset a taxpayer’s tax refund to satisfy certain debts. A spouse who believes that his or her portion of the refund should not be used to offset the debt that the other spouse owes may request a refund from the IRS.
Offset
If an individual owes money to the federal government because of a delinquent debt, the Treasury Department’s Financial Management Service (FMS) can offset that individual's tax refund (and certain other federal payments) to satisfy the debt. The debtor will be notified in advance of the offset.
A taxpayer’s refund may be reduced by FMS and offset to pay:
Past-due child support
Federal agency non-tax debts
State income tax obligations, or
Certain unemployment compensation debts owed a state.
FMS advises taxpayers by written notice of an offset. FMS has explained that the notice will reflect the original refund amount, the taxpayer’s offset amount, the agency receiving the payment, and the address and telephone number of the agency. FMS will notify the IRS of the amount taken from your refund.
Form 8379
If a taxpayer filed a joint return and is not responsible for the debt of his or her spouse, the taxpayer may request his or her portion of the refund by filing Form 8379, Injured Spouse Allocation, with the IRS. Form 8379 may be filed with the original return or by itself after the taxpayer is aware of the offset.
The IRS has instructed taxpayers filing Form 8379 by itself to attach a copy of all Forms W-2 and W-2G for both spouses, and any Forms 1099 showing federal income tax withholding to Form 8379. Failure to attach these items may result in a delay in processing by the IRS.
The IRS has reported on its website that it generally processes Forms 8379 that are filed after a joint return has been filed in approximately eight weeks. The timeframe for processing a Form 8379 that is attached to a joint return is approximately 11 weeks (14 weeks if the joint return is filed on paper).
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of February 2012.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of February 2012.
February 1
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates January 25–27.
February 3
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates January 28–31.
February 8
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 1–3.
February 10
Employees who work for tips. Employees who received $20 or more in tips during November must report them to their employer using Form 4070.
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 4–7.
February 15
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 8–10.
Monthly depositors. Monthly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payments in January.
February 17
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 11–14.
February 23
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 15–17.
February 24
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 18–21.
February 29
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 22–24.
March 2
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 25–28.
March 7
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates February 29–March 2.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of June 2010.
As an individual or business, it is your responsibility to be aware of and to meet your tax filing/reporting deadlines. This calendar summarizes important tax reporting and filing data for individuals, businesses and other taxpayers for the month of June 2010.
June 3
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 26-28.
June 4
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates May 29-June 1.
June 9
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 2-4.
June 10
Employees who work for tips. Employees who received $20 or more in tips during May must report them to their employer using Form 4070.
June 11
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 5-8.
June 15
Monthly depositors. Monthly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payments in May.
June 16
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 9-11.
June 18
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 12-15.
June 23
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 16-18.
June 25
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 19-22.
June 30
Employers. Semi-weekly depositors must deposit employment taxes for payroll dates June 23-25.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
At the start of 2010, Congress had a full tax agenda. As summer approaches, many tax bills remain unfinished, most notably an estate tax bill. Other important tax legislation is also on Congress's agenda for action before year-end.
At the start of 2010, Congress had a full tax agenda. As summer approaches, many tax bills remain unfinished, most notably an estate tax bill. Other important tax legislation is also on Congress's agenda for action before year-end.
Estate tax
The federal estate tax was abolished as of January 1, 2010. In its place, a modified carryover basis regime is applied to large estates. However, this treatment is temporary and the federal estate tax will return in 2011 at higher rates than in recent years.
Congress has tried several times, but failed, to extend the federal estate tax. In late 2009, the House approved a permanent extension of the estate tax but the bill has languished in the Senate. The estate tax was put on the back burner as the Senate debated health care reform and financial reform. The Senate could take up the House bill this summer or pass its own bill. In that case, the bill would have to go back to the House, delaying passage even more.
Individual tax rates
Almost 10 years ago, Congress passed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). The law gradually reduced the individual marginal tax rates. For 2010, the individual marginal tax rates are 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, and 35 percent. After December 31, 2011, the rates will revert to their pre-EGTRRA percentages. The top two rates will rise from 33 and 35 percent to 36 and 39.6 percent.
President Obama has asked Congress to extend all of the lower rates except for the top two rates. The 36 percent and 39.6 percent rates would apply to individuals with incomes over $200,000 and married couples filing joint returns with incomes over $250,000. Congress could extend the lower rates permanently or for a period of years. The large federal budget deficit has some lawmakers talking about a temporary extension of the lower rates and revisiting them when the economy rebounds.
Democratic leaders in the House and Senate have not indicated when legislation extending the lower rates will be introduced. Many lawmakers are wary of raising taxes before the November Congressional elections so legislation may wait until a lame duck session in December.
Capital gains and dividends
The maximum dividends and capital gains tax rate for 2010 is 15 percent (zero percent for taxpayers in the 10 or 15 percent brackets). After December 31, 2010, the maximum capital gains tax rate will rise to 20 percent for all taxpayers. Dividends will return to being taxed as ordinary income.
President Obama has also asked Congress to extend the current dividends and capital gains tax rate but impose a higher rate on higher-income taxpayers. The maximum rate on dividends and capital gains for individuals with incomes over $200,000 and married couples filing jointly with incomes over $250,000 would be 20 percent. The 15 and zero percent rates would apply to all other taxpayers.
AMT patch
The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is, as its name says, an alternative tax to the regular tax. Because the AMT was not indexed for inflation, and for other reasons, the AMT is gradually encroaching on middle income taxpayers, contrary to Congress's original intent. The large federal budget deficit again makes lawmakers wary of repealing the AMT. Instead, Congress has "patched" it annually.
The AMT patch provides relief by giving taxpayers higher exemption amounts. Additionally, the nonrefundable personal tax credits are allowed to the full extent of the taxpayer's regular tax and AMT liability.
Child tax credit
In 2009, Congress enhanced the child tax credit by increasing the refundable portion of the credit for the 2009 and 2010 tax years to 15 percent of earned income in excess of $3,000. Several bills are pending in Congress to make permanent the $3,000 threshold or reduce it even further.
More bills
Many tax bills have been introduced since the start of the year and have been referred to the House and Senate tax writing committees. Among the pending bills are ones to:
Extend the Making Work Pay Credit;
Extend the American Opportunity Tax Credit;
Renew the first-time homebuyer tax credit;
Reforming the worker classification rules;
Enhance transportation fringe benefits; and
Make permanent the Build America Bonds program.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about pending federal tax legislation.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The small business health insurance tax credit, created by the health care reform package, rewards employers that offer health insurance to their employees with a tax break. The credit is targeted to small employers; generally employers with 25 or fewer employees. In May 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-44, which describes the steps employers take to determine eligibility for the credit and how to calculate the credit.
The small business health insurance tax credit, created by the health care reform package, rewards employers that offer health insurance to their employees with a tax break. The credit is targeted to small employers; generally employers with 25 or fewer employees. In May 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-44, which describes the steps employers take to determine eligibility for the credit and how to calculate the credit.
Initial steps
1. Determine the employees taken into account for purposes of the credit.
Generally, any employee who performs services for you during the tax year is taken into account in determining your full-time employees (FTEs), average wages, and premiums paid. However partners and certain business owners are excluded. Additionally, family members of these owners and partners are also not taken into account as employees.
Example. A partnership employs five individuals, including one of the partners, Elise, and her spouse, Ron. For purposes of the credit, Elise and Ron are not taken into account as employees in determining the number of FTEs for purposes of the credit.
2. Determine the number of hours of service performed by those employees.
An employee's hours of service include (1) each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, for the performance of duties for the employer during the employer's tax year; and (2) each hour for which an employee is paid, or entitled to payment, by the employer on account of vacation, holiday, illness, and similar events. The IRS allows you to use one of three alternative methods to calculate hours of service: (1) actual hours of service; (2) days-worked equivalency; or (3) weeks-worked equivalency.
Example. Priscilla is an employee of ABC Co. ABC's payroll records show that Priscilla worked 2,000 hours and was paid for an additional 80 hours on account of vacation, holiday and illness in 2010. Priscilla performed 2,080 hours of service.
3. Calculate the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees.
Employers use a formula to calculate the number of FTEs. Total hours of service credited during the year to qualified employees (but not more than 2,080 hours for any employee) are divided by 2,080. The result, if not a whole number, is then rounded to the next lowest whole number.
Example. An employer pays five employees wages for 2,080 hours each, pays three employees wages for 1,040 hours each, and pays one employee wages for 2,300 hours. The employer's FTEs would be calculated as follows:
(1) Total hours of service not exceeding 2,080 per employee is the sum of:
(a) 10,400 hours of service for the five employees paid for 2,080 hours each (5 x 2,080);
(b) 3,120 hours of service for the three employees paid for 1,040 hours each (3 x 1,040); and
(c) 2,080 hours of service for the one employee paid for 2,300 hours (the lesser of 2,300 and 2,080).
The sum of (a), (b) and (c) equals 15,600 hours of service.
(2) The hours of service -- 15,600 -- are divided by 2,080, which equals 7.5. That number is rounded to the next lowest whole number, which is seven. The employer has seven FTEs.
4. Determine the average annual wages paid per FTE.
Employers also use a formula to determine average annual wages paid for a tax year. The amount of total wages paid to qualified employees is divided by the number of the employer's FTEs for the year. The result is then rounded down to the nearest $1,000 (if not otherwise a multiple of $1,000).
Example. XYZ Co. has 10 FTEs and pays average annual wages of $224,000 for the 2010 tax year. The amount of XYZ's average annual wages is $224,000 divided by 10, which equals $22,400. When rounded down to the nearest $1,000, is $22,000.
5. Determine the amount of premiums paid by the employer.
Only premiums paid by the employer for health insurance coverage are counted in calculating the credit. If an employer pays only a portion of the premiums for the coverage provided to employees (with employees paying the rest), only the portion paid by the employer is taken into account.
However, an employer's premium payments are not taken into account for purposes of the credit unless the payments are for health insurance coverage under a qualifying arrangement. Generally, this is an arrangement under which the employer pays premiums for each employee enrolled in health insurance coverage offered by the employer in an amount equal to a uniform percentage (not less than 50 percent) of the premium cost of the coverage.
Additionally, the amount of an employer's premium payments taken into account in calculating the credit is limited to the premium payments the employer would have made under the same arrangement if the average premium for the small group market in the state (or an area within the state) in which the employer offers coverage were substituted for the actual premium.
Example. MNO Co. offers a health insurance plan with single and family coverage to its nine FTEs with average annual wages of $23,000 per FTE. Four employees are enrolled in single coverage and five are enrolled in family coverage.
MNO pays 50 percent of the premiums for all employees enrolled in single coverage and 50 percent of the premiums for all employees enrolled in family coverage. The premiums are $4,000 a year for single coverage and $10,000 a year for family coverage. The average premium for the small group market in employer's State is $5,000 for single coverage and $12,000 for family coverage.
MNO's premium payments for each FTE ($2,000 for single coverage and $5,000 for family coverage) do not exceed 50 percent of the average premium for the small group market in employer's state ($2,500 for single coverage and $6,000 for family coverage).
The amount of premiums paid by the employer for purposes of computing the credit equals $33,000 ((4 x $2,000) + (5 x $5,000) = $33,000).
Calculating the credit
After determining eligibility for the credit, employers calculate the amount of their credit. The maximum credit is 35 percent for employers with 10 or fewer FTEs paying average annual wages of not more than $25,000. The maximum credit for a tax-exempt employer is 25 percent. The maximum 35 percent and 25 percent credits are available for 2010 through 2013. The maximum amounts rise for 2014 and 2015, but at that time the credit is linked to an employer's participation in a state insurance exchange.
The credit is subject to phase-out. The credit is reduced by 6.667 percent for each FTE in excess of 10 employees and by four percent for each $1,000 that average annual compensation paid to an employee exceeds $25,000.
The following examples illustrate calculation of the credit:
Small for-profit employer
PRS Co. employs nine FTEs with average annual wages of $23,000 per FTE for the 2010 tax year. PRS pays $72,000 in health insurance premiums for those employees (which does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the employer's state) and otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. PRS's credit for 2010 is $25,200 (35 percent x $72,000).
Small tax-exempt employer
TUV employs 10 FTES with average annual wages of $21,000 per FTE for the 2010 tax year. TUV pays $80,000 in health insurance premiums for its employees (which does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the employer's state) and otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. The total amount of the employer's income tax and Medicare tax withholding plus the employer's share of the Medicare tax equals $30,000 in 2010.
The credit is calculated as follows: (1) The initial amount of the credit is determined before any reduction: (25 percent x $80,000) = $20,000; (2) The employer's withholding and Medicare taxes are $30,000; (3) the total 2010 tax credit equals $20,000 (the lesser of $20,000 and $30,000).
We've covered a lot of material. Please contact our office if you have any questions about the small employer health insurance tax credit.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
401(k) plans represent the most preferred vehicle for retirement savings today - making up more than 60 percent of retirement plans, according to the IRS. However, 401(k) plans are also the most non-compliant type of retirement plan as well, according to a study by IRS Employee Plans Examinations. In light of the popularity and non-compliance of 401(k) plans, the IRS has launched a 401(k) "Compliance Check Questionnaire Project.
401(k) plans represent the most preferred vehicle for retirement savings today - making up more than 60 percent of retirement plans, according to the IRS. However, 401(k) plans are also the most non-compliant type of retirement plan as well, according to a study by IRS Employee Plans Examinations. In light of the popularity and non-compliance of 401(k) plans, the IRS has launched a 401(k) "Compliance Check Questionnaire Project."
The objective of the repost is to identify the areas where additional education, guidance, and outreach regarding 401(k) compliance are needed. The responses will also enable the IRS to determine where the agency needs to focus its enforcement efforts in order to address non-compliance related to the plans. Although the IRS has indicated that the questionnaire is not an audit or an investigation of the plans selected to complete the questionnaire, the agency has indicated that a plan sponsor's failure to respond may result in further enforcement action.
Random sample
As part of the project, the IRS has randomly selected 1,200 401(k) plans from among plans that filed a Form 5500 for the 2007 plan year. These plans will receive a letter from the IRS with instructions to complete the 401(k) questionnaire using a website established for this purpose, or mailing the questionnaire back to the IRS. Recipients of the questionnaire have 90 days to complete and return the questionnaire. If a plan sponsor receives a letter to complete the questionnaire, they must follow the instructions included in the letter. Plan sponsors that wish to complete the questionnaire on-line will receive personal identification numbers and other information needed to create an on-line profile for purposes of providing the information on-line.
Categories
The questionnaire includes the following categories:
Demographics;
401(k) plan participation;
Employer and employee contributions;
Top heavy and nondiscrimination rules;
Distributions and plan loans;
Other plan operations;
Automatic contribution arrangements;
Designated Roth features;
IRS voluntary compliance programs; and
Plan administration.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The health care reform package makes two important changes to insurance coverage for young adults. First, the new law allows young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance plan until age 26. Second, the new law extends certain favorable tax treatment to coverage for young adults.
The health care reform package makes two important changes to insurance coverage for young adults. First, the new law allows young adults to remain on their parents' health insurance plan until age 26. Second, the new law extends certain favorable tax treatment to coverage for young adults.
Extended coverage
Traditionally, many plans and insurers would remove adult children from their parents' policies because of age, status as a student, or residence. Under the new law, plans and insurers that offer dependent coverage must offer coverage to an enrollee's adult children until age 26, even if the young adult no longer lives with his or her parents, is not a dependent on a parent's federal tax return or is no longer a student. Married and unmarried young adults are covered but not their children.
Let's look at an example:
Anita is 22 years old, is a full-time student and expects to graduate from college school in 2011. Anita is covered by her mother's employer-provided health insurance. Before the new law, the plan would have terminated coverage for Anita after her 23rd birthday or when she graduated from college, whichever came first. The health care reform package requires the plan to make coverage available until Anita reaches age 26.
The expansion up to age 26 is effective for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010. Many insurance companies have agreed to implement the new requirement before the effective date. These insurance companies will voluntarily continue coverage for young adults with no break in coverage.
Keep in mind that the new law does not compel a plan or insurer to offer dependent coverage. But if a plan does offer dependent coverage, the new law requires such plans to extend that coverage until a child reaches age 26.
There is one important exception. If a young adult is eligible to obtain health insurance from his or her employer, the parent's plan is not obligated to extend coverage to age 26. This exception is temporary: starting in 2014, children up to age 26 can stay on their parent's employer plan even if their own employer offers coverage.
Income tax exclusion
Before passage of the health care reform package, employer-provided health insurance coverage was generally excluded from income if the employee's child was under age 19 or under age 24 if a student. The new law extends the income tax exclusion to any employee's child who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. For most individuals, this is the calendar year. Although a health plan will be required to cover a dependent up to age 26, the plan may be more generous and provide for coverage through the end of the year in which the adult child celebrates his or her 26th birthday.
Under the new law, it is also no longer necessary for the child of the employee to be a dependent of the employee for the income tax exclusion to apply. A child for purposes of the extended exclusion is an individual who is the son, daughter, stepson, or stepdaughter of the employee. The definition of child also includes adopted children and eligible foster children.
Let's look at an example:
Amy works for ABC Co. which provides health care coverage for its employees and their spouses and for any employee's child who has not attained age 27 as of the end of the tax year. For the 2010 tax year, ABC provides health care coverage to Amy and her son Jason, who will not attain age 27 until after the end of the 2010 tax year. The health care reform package treats Jason as a child of Amy. Accordingly, and because Jason will not attain age 27 during the 2010 tax year, the health care coverage for Jason under ABC's plan is excluded from Amy's gross income.
The IRS and other federal agencies have published guidance about all the changes affecting young adults in the health care reform package. Employers, plans and insurers are also alerting taxpayers about the changes. Please contact our office if you have any questions.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
There are two important energy tax credits that can benefit homeowners in 2010: (1) the nonbusiness energy property credit and (2) the residential energy efficient property credit. Collectively, they are known as the "home energy tax credits." With the home energy tax credits, you can not only lower your utility bill by making energy-saving improvements to your home, but you can lower your tax bill in 2010 as well. Eligible taxpayers can claim the credits regardless of whether or not they itemize their deductions on Schedule A. Your costs for making these energy improvements are treated as paid when the installation of the item is completed.
There are two important energy tax credits that can benefit homeowners in 2010: (1) the nonbusiness energy property credit and (2) the residential energy efficient property credit. Collectively, they are known as the "home energy tax credits." With the home energy tax credits, you can not only lower your utility bill by making energy-saving improvements to your home, but you can lower your tax bill in 2010 as well. Eligible taxpayers can claim the credits regardless of whether or not they itemize their deductions on Schedule A. Your costs for making these energy improvements are treated as paid when the installation of the item is completed.
Nonbusiness energy property credit
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (2009 Recovery Act) extended the nonbusiness energy credit for 2009 and 2010. The nonbusiness property credit equals 30 percent of a homeowner's expenses on eligible energy-saving improvements, up to $1,500 for both the 2009 and 2010 tax years. Qualifying expenses include costs of certain high-efficiency heating and air conditioning systems, water heaters and stoves that burn biomass, asphalt roofs, as well as costs associated with the installation of these items. The costs of energy-efficient windows, skylights, and doors, and qualifying insulation also qualify for the credit. However, the costs of installing these items do not qualify. Since the credit amounts are combined for both 2009 and 2010, if you made energy improvements in 2009 to which you claimed part of the expenses, you must take that into consideration when claiming the credit in 2010 for qualified expenses. The credit applies only to your principal residence, and special rules apply to condo owners.
Residential energy efficient property credit
The credit rate for the residential energy property credit equals 30 percent of the cost of all qualifying improvements. The residential energy efficient property credit can be claimed for solar electric systems, solar hot water heaters, geothermal heat pumps, wind turbines, and fuel cell property. Generally, labor costs are included when calculating this credit. No cap exists on the amount of the credit available, except in the case of fuel cell property.
Caution. As in the case of the nonbusiness energy property credit, not all energy-efficient improvements qualify for this tax credit. As such, you should check the manufacturer's tax credit certification statement before purchasing or installing any energy-efficient property. We can help you determine your eligibility based on a certification statement.
Reporting
Both energy credits are claimed by eligible homeowners when they file their 2010 federal income tax return. While you do not get an immediate check from Uncle Sam since you claim it on your 2010 return filed in 2011, you might be able to lower your estimated tax payments or withholding immediately to enjoy the benefits of the credit earlier.
Both the nonbusiness energy property credit and the residential energy property credit are claimed and figured on Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits. Since these are credits, not deductions, they increase a taxpayer's refund or reduce the tax he or she owes. An eligible taxpayer can claim these credits, regardless of whether he or she itemizes deductions on Schedule A. Use Form 5695, Residential Energy Credits, to figure and claim these credits. Certain other credits you claim for the 2010 tax year, if any, will affect your computation of the home energy credits.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
If you have or are planning to move - whether it's a change of personal residence or a change of business address - you want the IRS to know about your change of address. The IRS has recently updated its procedures for taxpayers to follow when notifying the IRS of a change of address. The IRS uses a taxpayer's "address of record" for mailing certain notices and documents that the agency is required to send to a taxpayer's last known address.
If you have or are planning to move - whether it's a change of personal residence or a change of business address - you want the IRS to know about your change of address. The IRS has recently updated its procedures for taxpayers to follow when notifying the IRS of a change of address. The IRS uses a taxpayer's "address of record" for mailing certain notices and documents that the agency is required to send to a taxpayer's last known address.
The IRS's process for updating changes of address is important for both individual and business taxpayers because a notice or document sent to your (or your business') "last known address" is legally effective and binding, even if you never receive it because you have moved. This presumption of delivery includes such important correspondence as notices of deficiency, liens and levies.
Have you moved since April 15?
If you have already filed your federal income tax return (or any other respective business tax return, such as Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income), and have since moved from the address that you provided on your return, you need to inform the IRS. This is because the IRS automatically uses the address on your return as its "address of record." Thus, when a taxpayer files a tax return, such as a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, the address on your return is automatically updated by the IRS after the return has been properly processed (tax returns are considered properly processed after a 45-day period that begins on the day after the return is received by the IRS.)
Therefore, if you move to a new address after filing your return, you need to ensure the IRS has your new address. This can generally be done in one of several ways. First, when a taxpayer provides the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) with a new address, the IRS automatically updates the taxpayer's address of record with the address maintained in the USPS's National Change of Address database. So, when you change your address with the USPS to have your mail forwarded to your new address, the IRS may also update you address of record based on the new address you provide the USPS. However, take caution. You should nonetheless notify the IRS directly of your change of address to ensure the IRS has your correct address. This can be done by filing Form 8822, Change of Address, with the IRS.
However, you can also provide the IRS with your change of address by giving the agency "clear and concise notification" of the change. This can be done electronically, written, or orally, and is discussed below. We recommend such followup notification just in case the IRS fails to follow one of its updating procedures.
Types of returns automatically updated when filed
The IRS's updated procedure (Revenue Procedure 2010-16) not only lists the types of returns on which address provided thereon are automatically updated into its "address of record" database, it also makes clear that certain forms are not considered returns and therefore not automatically updated if a new address is listed. Specifically, a new address listed on (1) Form 4868, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, or (2) Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, are not used by the IRS to automatically update a taxpayer's address. The IRS does not consider these to be returns. Therefore, if you file these forms providing a new address, you will need to use another method for informing the IRS of the address change, such as filing Form 8822.
The types of returns from which addresses are automatically updated by the IRS include, but are not limited t
-- Individual income tax returns (e.g., Forms 1040, 1040A, Form 1040X, 1040-SS, 1040EZ, 1040NR, 1040NR-EZ); -- Gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer tax returns (e.g. Forms 706 series, 709 series); and -- Returns filed under an employer identification number (e.g., Forms 720, 730, 940, 941 series, 943, 945, 940, 990 series, 1041, 1042, 1065 series, and 1120 series.
Comment. Because the IRS maintains address records for gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax returns that are separate from records maintained for individual income tax returns, an individual's notification of a change of address should identify whether any gift, estate, or GST transfer tax returns are affected.
Documents and notices
The IRS uses the last known address for mailing a number of important documents and notices, as well as any refund you may be owed. Therefore, it is imperative for taxpayers to ensure that the IRS has your proper change of address information. Such notices and documents include, among others, deficiency notices, notices of intent to levy, notices and demand for tax, employment status determinations, notices of third party summonses, notices regarding interest abatements, and notices of final determinations regarding spousal support.
Clear and concise notification
Taxpayers that want to change their address of record can do so by providing the IRS with a "clear and concise notification" that is in accord with the agency's procedures. As previously mentioned, clear and concise notification may be made in writing, electronically, or orally. You must in any case, must provide the your full name, new address, old address, and Social Security number (SSN), individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN), or employer identification number (EIN) when providing the "clear and concise notification" procedures.
Written. The filing of Form 8822, Change of Address, is one way to meet the "clear and concise notification" requirement, for example. You can also provide the IRS with a written statement signed by you, informing the IRS you wish to change your address of record. You must include information such as your full name, new and old address, SSN, ITIN, or EIN as well. If you file a return with your spouse, you should both provide this information as well.
Electronic. You can also satisfy the "clear and concise" requirement by electronically notifying the IRS. You must use a secure application located on the IRS's website, www.irs.gov. A "secure application" is one that requires the taxpayer to verify the taxpayer's identity before accessing the application. However, other forms of electronic notice, such as emailing an IRS email address, do not constitute clear and concise notification.
Verbal. You can also provide the IRS with a change of address orally, by providing a statement - whether in person or directly via telephone -- to an IRS employee. Again, it is a good idea to follow up your telephone call with another call to verify that your address has in fact been inputted properly.
If you have any questions about change of address procedures, please call our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Congress returned from its spring recess in April to a full agenda of tax legislation that will impact individuals and businesses. Lawmakers are hoping to complete work on as many bills as possible before their Memorial Day recess but the Senate's timetable may be slowed by many non-tax issues. Among the most pressing bills are a package of tax extenders and estate tax relief. Many taxpayers are also waiting to learn the fate of the 2001-2010 individual marginal tax cuts and the popular first-time homebuyer tax credit.
Congress returned from its spring recess in April to a full agenda of tax legislation that will impact individuals and businesses. Lawmakers are hoping to complete work on as many bills as possible before their Memorial Day recess but the Senate's timetable may be slowed by many non-tax issues. Among the most pressing bills are a package of tax extenders and estate tax relief. Many taxpayers are also waiting to learn the fate of the 2001-2010 individual marginal tax cuts and the popular first-time homebuyer tax credit.
Tax extenders
Both the House and Senate have passed tax extenders bills. The House's Tax Extenders Act of 2009 and the Senate's American Workers, State and Business Relief Act of 2010 would extend many temporary tax incentives that expired at the end of 2009. For businesses, the incentives include the research tax credit, 15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold improvement property, and special tax breaks for farmers, film and television production, environmental clean-up, and more. For individuals, the incentives include the state and local sales tax deduction, the teacher's classroom expense deduction and the higher education tuition deduction.
The House and Senate extenders bills are similar but differ in how they are offset. The House bill includes a package of foreign account compliance rules that were recently enacted in the Hiring Incentives to Raise Employment (HIRE) Act. The Senate bill would codify the economic substance doctrine, a measure that was enacted as part of the health care reform package passed earlier this year. Lawmakers will need to find new offsets to fund a final tax extenders bill.
Estate tax
The federal estate tax does not apply to decedents dying after December 31, 2009 and before January 1, 2011. Also, effective for 2010, the stepped-up basis at death rules are replaced with modified carryover basis at death rules applicable to estates holding assets with unrealized capital gains of more than $1.3 million.
The House has approved legislation to permanently extend the federal estate tax at its 2009 levels. On more than one occasion, Senate Democrats have tried to enact a temporary one-year extension of the federal estate tax but have failed. If the Senate agrees on a one-year extension of the federal estate tax, the House will have to approve the Senate bill. If the extension is temporary, Congress also will need to address the level of estate tax to be imposed after 2010 when, without further action, the estate tax returns at much higher pre-2001 levels.
Individual marginal rates
In 2001, Congress reduced the individual marginal income tax rates. The current individual marginal income tax rates are 10, 15, 28, 31, 33, and 35 percent. These rates will sunset after December 31, 2010 unless extended by Congress.
The Obama administration has proposed to extend permanently the tax rate brackets of 10, 15, 28, and 31 percent but to raise the top two brackets to 36 percent and 39.6 percent respectively. These proposed rate increases would apply to single taxpayers with incomes over $200,000 and married taxpayers filing a joint return with incomes over $250,000. Likewise, the maximum 15 percent capital gains rate that now applies to all taxpayers would increase to 20 percent for these higher income taxpayers.
Because of the looming sunset date of the lower rates, lawmakers are under pressure to act before the end of 2010. Senate Democrats have begun preliminary actions to move the lower rates as part of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 federal budget bill under special reconciliation rules. These rules require only a simple majority rather than a super-majority of 60 votes to pass legislation in the Senate. However, use of the reconciliation process is expected to be challenged by Senate Republicans who oppose the hike in the top two rates.
VAT
Since Congress' return in April, there has been much speculation on Capitol Hill about introducing a European-style value added tax (VAT) to the U.S. to reduce the federal budget deficit. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has indicated that the administration is not endorsing a VAT. President Obama has appointed a special tax reform commission to examine all federal taxes across-the-board. However, Democratic leaders in the House and Senate have said that comprehensive tax reform must wait until the economy rebounds.
Business incentives
Many business-related tax incentives have been proposed in the House and Senate but have not been enacted. Some limited business incentives may be included in FY 2011 federal budget legislation. The Obama administration has proposed to eliminate capital gains taxation on small businesses and make permanent the research tax credit.
Taxpayer Assistance Act
On April 15, the House passed the Taxpayer Assistance Act of 2010 (TAA). Many of the provisions are not controversial but it is unclear if and when the Senate will take up the bill. Among other things, the TAA would:
Removes cell phones from the listed property rules that trigger heightened documentation and substantiation rules;
Repeal the partial payment requirement on submissions of offers-in-compromise;
Authorize the IRS to use mass communication (including the internet) to notify taxpayers of undelivered refunds; and
Require the IRS to notify taxpayers if it suspects that their identities (or the identities of their dependents) have been stolen.
The TAA is offset by two revenue raisers. The TAA would extend the bad check penalty to electronic payments and increase information return penalties.
Homebuyer tax credit
The first-time homebuyer tax credit is one of the most popular tax incentives in recent years. Supporters claim it has encouraged buyers to purchase homes during the economic downturn.
The 10 percent (up to $8,000) refundable first-time homebuyer credit expired after April 30, 2010. However, if a binding sales contract was signed on or before April 30, 2010, a home purchase completed on or before June 30, 2010 will qualify for the credit.
At this time, Congress is not expected to extend the homebuyer credit. Although popular, its cost has discouraged fiscal conservatives in Congress from supporting an extension. If Congress takes up an extension of the credit, our office will keep you posted of developments.
COBRA premium assistance
On April 15, President Obama signed the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (CEA). The CEA extends eligibility for COBRA premium assistance through May 31, 2010. The CEA also provides transition relief for assistance eligible individuals who were involuntarily terminated from employment between March 31, 2010 and the date of enactment of the CEA. The Obama administration has indicated its support for extending COBRA premium assistance through the end of 2010.
Energy
The Obama administration has asked Congress to eliminate a number of tax incentives for fossil fuels. The administration proposes to abolish, among other things, the enhanced tax credit for oil and gas produced from marginal wells, the use of percentage depletion with respect to oil, gas and hard mineral fossil fuels, and the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction for the production of oil, gas and coal. These incentives enjoy significant support in Congress and it is uncertain if lawmakers will agree to eliminate them.
Ponzi scheme victims
The Ponzi Victims Tax Bill of Rights (S. 3166), recently introduced in the Senate, would provide targeted relief to individuals who are victimized by Ponzi schemes. The bill would allow direct and indirect investors with qualified fraudulent investment losses to carry back eligible losses for up to six tax years. Taxpayers over age 65 could carry back their qualified losses for up to seven years. The bill would also allow Ponzi victims to claim a loss deduction for a fraudulent investment loss in an individual retirement account (IRA) and carry back the IRA loss deduction for up to six years with a 20 year carry forward.
Additional measures include:
Allowing special catch-up contributions to IRAs held by Ponzi scheme victims;
Waiving the 10 percent penalty for early distributions from retirement plans for individuals who suffered a loss related to a Ponzi scheme; and
Allowing estate tax returns for decedents dying after December 31, 2007 to be amended to account for Ponzi scheme assets.
Airline baggage fees
Congress is also expected to act, if airlines do not, to prevent airlines from imposing fees on carry-on baggage. The IRS determined in LTR 201002004 that carry-on baggage was nonessential for air travel and, thus, not subject to a special federal excise tax. Many lawmakers have expressed concern that the decision encourages airlines to impose fees on carry-on bags. Pending legislation would not allow these carry-on fees.
Tax compliance
The Obama administration has asked Congress to strengthen the IRS' compliance and enforcement arms. Among the measures endorsed by the administration are proposals t
Make willful failure to file a tax return a felony;
Expand information sharing between the IRS and the states;
Allow assessment of court-ordered criminal restitution as tax; and
Boost the IRS's operating budget so it can hire more examiners and agents.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about pending federal tax legislation.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The IRS is moving quickly to alert employers about a new tax credit for health insurance premiums. The recently enacted health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) created the small employer health insurance tax credit. The temporary credit is targeted to small employers that offer or will offer health insurance coverage to their employees. The credit, like so many federal tax incentives, has certain qualifications. Please contact our office and we can arrange to review in detail how the credit may cut the cost of your business's health insurance premiums. The dollar benefits of the credit are substantial and they apply immediately to 2010 premium costs.
The IRS is moving quickly to alert employers about a new tax credit for health insurance premiums. The recently enacted health care reform package (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) created the small employer health insurance tax credit. The temporary credit is targeted to small employers that offer or will offer health insurance coverage to their employees. The credit, like so many federal tax incentives, has certain qualifications. Please contact our office and we can arrange to review in detail how the credit may cut the cost of your business's health insurance premiums. The dollar benefits of the credit are substantial and they apply immediately to 2010 premium costs.
Outreach
The IRS is sending postcards to more than four million small businesses in coming weeks. The postcards briefly describe the new tax credit and are just one part of the IRS's outreach campaign to educate employers about the credit. The IRS has also created a special page on its web site on the credit along with a fact sheet and frequently asked questions and answers.
Maximum credit
The new health care credit is effective immediately so employers need to plan now to take advantage of it. The credit, which is available over the next five years, also rises over time but the enhanced credit comes with some additional requirements.
For tax years beginning in 2010 through 2013, the maximum credit reaches 35 percent of qualified premium costs paid by for-profit employers. The maximum credit is 25 percent of qualified premium costs paid by tax-exempt employers.
The maximum credit climbs to 50 percent of qualified premium costs paid by for-profit employers (35 percent for tax-exempt employers) for tax years beginning in 2014 through 2015. However, Congress imposed some additional requirements. An employer may claim the credit only if it offers one or more qualified health plans through a state insurance exchange. The health care reform package requires states to create insurance exchanges by January 1, 2014.
Example. ABC Co. employs nine individuals with average annual wages of $23,000 for each employee in 2010. ABC pays $72,000 in health care premiums for its employees. This amount does not exceed the average premium for the small group market in the state in which ABC offers coverage and ABC otherwise meets the requirements for the credit. ABC's credit for 2010 is $25,200 (35 percent x $72,000).
Tax-exempt employers have additional limitations. If the amount of their credit exceeds the amount of payroll taxes of the tax-exempt employer during the calendar year in which the tax year begins, the credit is limited to the amount of payroll taxes.
FTEs
The maximum credit is available to qualified employers with no more than 10 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees paying average annual wages of $25,000 or less. The credit completely phases out if an employer has 25 or more FTEs or pays $50,000 or more in average annual wages. Effectively, a small employer can have exactly 25 FTEs or pay average annual compensation of exactly $50,000 and not receive a credit under the phase-out rules. The monetary amounts are adjusted for inflation after 2013.
The health care reform package explains how to calculate the number of FTEs. The number of an employer's FTEs is determined by dividing the total hours for which the employer pays wages to employees during the year (but not more than 2,080 hours for any employee) by 2,080. The result, if not a whole number, is rounded to the next lowest whole number. Lawmakers selected 2,080 hours because 2,080 hours comprise the number of hours in a 52-week assuming a 40-hour work week. Any hours beyond 2,080, such as overtime hours, are not taken into account when calculating FTEs.
Example. ABC Co has nine employees. ABC pays Aidan, Bonnie, Catherine, David, and Eddie wages for 2,080 hours each for 2010. ABC pays Francine, Gary and Harry wages for 1,040 hours each for 2010. ABC pays Kieran wages for 2,300 hours for 2010. The total hours not exceeding 2,080 per employee is the sum of: --10,400 hours for the five employees paid for 2,080 hours each (5 x 2,080) plus --3,120 hours for the three employees paid for 1,040 hours each (3 x 1,040) plus --2,080 hours for the one employee paid for 2,300 hours (lesser of 2,300 and 2,080), which add up to 15,600 hours.
To calculate the number of FTEs, 15,600 is divided by 2,080, which results in 7.5, rounded to the next lowest whole number.
Average annual wages
A formula is also used to calculate average annual wages. The amount of average annual wages is determined by first dividing the total wages paid by the employer to employees during the employer's tax year by the number of the employer's FTEs for the year. The result is then rounded down to the nearest $1,000 (if not otherwise a multiple of $1,000).
Example. ABC Co. pays $224,000 in wages and has 10 FTEs. ABC's average annual wages are $224,000 divided by 10 which equals $22,400, and is rounded down to the nearest $1,000 for a final number of $22,000
Owners and family members
Some individuals are excluded from the calculation of FTEs and average annual wages. These include a sole proprietor, a partner in a partnership, a shareholder owning more than two percent of an S corporation, and any owner of more than five percent of other businesses. Certain family members of these individuals are also excluded from the calculation of FTEs and average annual wages. These include a child, a parent, a sibling, and others. This list is not exhaustive. Please contact our office for more details about who is excluded from these calculations.
Premium deduction
Employers generally may deduct the cost of health insurance premiums paid on behalf of employees. The health care reform package does not change this general rule. However, the amount of premiums that an employer may deduct is reduced by the amount of the small employer health care tax credit.
Qualifying arrangement
Only premiums paid by the employer under a qualifying arrangement are counted in calculating the credit. Under a qualifying arrangement, the employer pays premiums for each employee enrolled in health care coverage offered by the employer in an amount equal to a uniform percentage (not less than 50 percent) of the premium cost of the coverage. The IRS is developing transition relief for 2010.
Additionally, the amount of an employer's premium payments is capped in relation to the average premium for the small group market. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will determine the average premium for the small group market in a state.
Congress is currently reviewing the costs of premiums. The health care reform package includes a requirement, effective in 2011, that insurance companies spend at least 80 percent of premium revenue on actual health care. Additionally, the health care reform package establishes a process for the annual review of premium increases prior to their use along with public disclosure of how premium rates are determined.
Claiming the credit
Qualified for-profit employers will claim the credit on their annual income tax return. The IRS is expected to advise how tax-exempt employers will claim the credit. Our office will keep you posted of developments.
According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, a qualified small business can choose to start offering health insurance coverage to employees in 2010 and be eligible for the credit. If you are considering providing insurance coverage to your employees, please contact our office. If you have already been paying premiums, don't leave maximizing the new credit to chance; we can help you navigate the many federal rules that come into play.
As always, please contact our office if you have any questions about the new small employer health insurance tax credit.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
The enhanced expensing election under Code Sec. 179 has been extended through December 31, 2010. Under Code Sec. 179, businesses can elect to recover all or part of the cost of qualifying property by deducting (rather than depreciating) the property in the year it is "placed in service," up to a certain limit.
The enhanced expensing election under Code Sec. 179 has been extended through December 31, 2010. Under Code Sec. 179, businesses can elect to recover all or part of the cost of qualifying property by deducting (rather than depreciating) the property in the year it is "placed in service," up to a certain limit.
The Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act has raised the dollar limit to $250,000 with a cap of $800,000 for qualified purchases made in tax years beginning after December 31, 2009 and before January 1, 2011 (the same amounts as in effect for 2009). Under the HIRE Act, Code Sec. 179 expensing can be taken until qualified purchases reach $1,050,000 ($800,000 + $250,000).
Note. Although the HIRE Act has extended enhanced expensing under Code Sec. 179, the new law did not extend bonus depreciation. Bonus depreciation expired at the end of 2009.
Expense planning
Code Sec. 179 expensing is keyed to a business's tax year, so the extension under the HIRE Act applies to purchases made in the tax years after December 31, 2009 and before January 1, 2011. This gives some fiscal year small businesses well into 2011 to take advantage of the Code Sec. 179 expensing extension.
Qualifying property
The allowable amount of the election to expense depreciable property is based on the cost or purchase price. Code Sec. 179 expensing is available for both new and used property. The HIRE Act also provides that off-the-shelf computer software, a popular business purchase, is Code Sec. 179 property.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Health care reform is now law and many employers are asking how does it affect my business and my employees? The first thing to keep in mind is that reform is gradual. The health care reforms and tax provisions in the new health care reform package play out over time, with some taking effect this year or next year but others not until 2014 and beyond. However, the health care package imposes significant new responsibilities and taxes on employers and individuals so it is not too early to start preparing.
Health care reform is now law and many employers are asking how does it affect my business and my employees? The first thing to keep in mind is that reform is gradual. The health care reforms and tax provisions in the new health care reform package play out over time, with some taking effect this year or next year but others not until 2014 and beyond. However, the health care package imposes significant new responsibilities and taxes on employers and individuals so it is not too early to start preparing.
Two new laws
Health care reform is actually made up of two new laws. The first is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, signed by President Obama on March 23. The second is the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, signed by the president on March 26. The Patient Protection Act, which reflects the Senate's original health care reform bill, provides the overall framework for reform. The Reconciliation Act was drafted in the House to make changes to the Patient Protection Act, especially in the area of cost-sharing and in some of the revenue raisers.
Employer responsibility
The final health care package, unlike earlier versions, does not include an employer mandate. However, any employer with more than 50 full-time employees that does not offer health insurance and has at least one full-time employee receiving a premium assistance tax credit or cost-sharing will pay a per-employee penalty. An employer with more than 50 full-time employees that offers coverage that the government deems unaffordable or fails to meet minimum standards and has at least one full-time employee receiving a premium assistance tax credit or cost-sharing also will pay a per-employee penalty. Small employers with less than 50 employees will not be penalized in any case. The penalty rules apply starting in 2014.
Small employers that provide health insurance coverage are eligible for a new tax credit. A sliding scale tax credit is available immediately in 2010 for qualified small employers. The IRS is expected to make guidance for the new credit a priority. If your small business offers or is thinking of offering health insurance to your workers, the credit could generate significant cost-savings. Please contact our office and we can discuss the details of the credit in depth.
Individual responsibility
Unlike employers, individuals have a mandate under the health care reform package. Beginning in 2014, most individuals will be responsible for maintaining health insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents. If they do not have minimum essential coverage, they will be liable for a penalty.
The health care package excludes many individuals from the mandatory coverage requirement. Any individual or family who currently has coverage can retain that coverage under a "grandfather" provision. Individuals with incomes below the federal filing threshold, religious objectors, individuals covered by Medicaid and Medicare and others are also exempt.
The health care package provides a premium assistance tax credit and cost-sharing to help make coverage more affordable. The premium assistance tax credit is calculated on a sliding scale based on the individual's income in relation to the federal poverty level. Cost-sharing reduces the cost of coverage for qualified individuals. The premium assistance tax credit and cost-sharing generally will be available after 2013.
High-dollar plans
One of the principal revenue raisers to fund health care reform is a new excise tax on high-dollar health insurance plans. The health care reform package imposes an excise tax of 40 percent on insurance companies or plan administrators for any health insurance plan with an annual premium in excess of $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families. The excise tax applies to the amount in excess of the $10,200/$27,500 levels. The thresholds are higher for individuals in high-risk occupations and individuals over age 55. The excise tax will not kick in until 2018.
Medicare additional tax and surtax
Changes to the hospital insurance (HI)(Medicare) tax also fund health care reform. These changes impact higher-income individuals and families.
The health care reform package increases the Medicare tax by 0.9 percent for individuals who receive wages in excess of $200,000 (the threshold increases to $250,000 for married couples who file a joint federal income tax return). Additionally, the new law imposes a 3.8 percent surtax (called the Unearned Income Medicare Contribution) on investment income for individuals with adjusted gross incomes above $200,000 ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly). Investment income includes income from interest and dividends.
The additional Medicare tax on wages and the additional Medicare contribution on investment income take effect in 2013, so taxpayers have some time to prepare. Please contact our office for more details about how these tax changes may impact you.
Flexible spending arrangements
Flexible spending arrangements (FSAs) are a very popular way to save and pay for health care expenses. One of the most attractive features is the ability to use FSA dollars for over-the-counter medications. The health care reform package ends that feature after 2010.
In 2011 and subsequent years, FSA dollars can only be used to pay for prescription medications (with some limited exceptions). In 2013, the health care reform package limits the amount of contributions to health FSAs to $2,500 per year. The $2,500 amount will be indexed for inflation after 2013.
More provisions
The health care reform package als
Increases the AGI threshold for claiming the itemized deduction for medical expenses for regular tax purposes to 10 percent after 2012 with a delayed effective date for seniors;
Extends dependent coverage up to age 26;
Expands Medicaid eligibility;
Requires states to establish insurance exchanges to help individuals and small employers obtain coverage;
Increases the additional tax on distributions from health savings accounts (HSAs) not used for qualified medical expenses;
Eliminates the employer deduction for Medicare Part D;
Imposes annual fees on pharmaceutical manufacturers and health insurance providers;
Imposes an excise tax on medical device manufacturers;
Requires more corporate information reporting;
Imposes new requirements on non-profit hospitals;
Accelerates some corporate estimated income taxes in 2014;
Imposes an excise tax on indoor tanning services;
Codifies the economic substance doctrine; and
Modifies the biofuel credit.
In the coming months and years, the IRS and other federal agencies will issue many new rules and regulations to implement health care reform. Our office will keep you posted of developments, and, as always, please contact us if you have any questions.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
Debt that a borrower no longer is liable for because it is discharged by the lender can give rise to taxable income to the borrower. Debt forgiveness income or cancellation of debt income ("COD" income) is the amount of debt that a lender has discharged or canceled. However, in many situations, the canceled debt is excluded from taxable income.
Debt that a borrower no longer is liable for because it is discharged by the lender can give rise to taxable income to the borrower. Debt forgiveness income or cancellation of debt income ("COD" income) is the amount of debt that a lender has discharged or canceled. However, in many situations, the canceled debt is excluded from taxable income.
Credit cards, car loans and mortgage debt are three of the most common consumer debts, yet many individuals don't know the tax rules surrounding discharges of these debts by lenders. In general, almost all types of discharged debt will be includable in the borrower's taxable income, unless a specific exclusion applies.
The creditor will generally report COD income to the IRS and to the debtor, using Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, even if an exclusion applies. The creditor may not be aware that the debtor can exclude the COD income. We can help you determine whether an exclusion applies.
Exclusions and reduction of attributes
There are four situations where cancelled debt does not result in taxable income:
1. The debt has been discharged through a bankruptcy proceeding under Title 11; 2. Insolvency (your total debts exceed your total assets); 3. The debt is due to a qualified farm expense ("qualified farm indebtedness"); and 4. The debt is due to certain real property business losses ("qualified real property business indebtedness").
When canceled debt is excluded from income, the debtor may be required to reduce tax attributes, such as a net capital loss or the basis of property. The reduction of attributes must be reported on Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness, and attached to your federal income tax return.
Other exclusions may apply to student loans, disaster victims, gifts, general welfare payments, and payments that would have been deductible.
Mortgage debt forgiveness
For a limited period of time, certain mortgage debt that is discharged by the lender is excludable from COD income and therefore does not result in taxable income to homeowners. This debt is generally referred to as "qualified principal residence indebtedness." The cancellation of qualifying mortgage debt is excludable from income if it is incurred with respect to the taxpayer's principal residence for "acquisition" debt forgiven on or after January 1, 2007 and before January 1, 2013. Acquisition debt is indebtedness secured by the residence and incurred in the acquisition, construction or substantial improvement of the residence.
Certain debt used to refinance the debt is also eligible. Debt forgiven on a second home or rental property does not qualify for the exclusion.
Example. Anne's principal residence is subject to a $300,000 mortgage debt. Anne's creditor forecloses on the property in September 2010. Due to the depressed real estate market, Anne's home sold for $220,000. The creditor forgives the other $80,000 of debt. Anne has COD income totaling $80,000 ($300,000 - $220,000).
Credit card and car loan debt
Noticeably absent from the specific exceptions to COD income are two of the biggest consumer debt items: credit cards and car loans. Credit card debt or an unpaid debt on a car loan that is forgiven by the lender is includable in gross income, unless the debtor is bankrupt or insolvent. The lender will report the amount of forgiven debt on Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt.
Example. Michael has an outstanding credit card bill of $7,400. Michael cannot pay the total amount but reaches a compromise with his credit card company in which he settles the debt for $4,000. Assuming the debtor is not bankrupt or insolvent, the Internal Revenue Code treats him as having realized a personal net gain (and COD income) of $3,400, even though he did not actually receive any money. The credit card company will report the $3,400 as COD income on Form 1099-C, and the debtor must include it in his gross income.
Reporting
If you had debt discharged in 2009 that does not qualify for an exception, you must include the amount of cancelled debt in your gross income on your tax return. If you have questions about COD income, the exclusions from income, or your reporting responsibilities, please contact our office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
In response to the economic downturn that has affected the retirement portfolios of millions of individuals across the country, Congress has been considering a variety of alternatives to offer relief to those who face financial emergencies and need immediate access to their funds. Two of the most significant proposals that have been recommended include: (1) significant broadening of the suspension of the 10 percent penalty tax on early withdrawals from IRAs and defined contribution plans, and (2) extending the temporary suspension of the penalty tax imposed on individuals age 70 ½ or older who do not take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain retirement plans.
In response to the economic downturn that has affected the retirement portfolios of millions of individuals across the country, Congress has been considering a variety of alternatives to offer relief to those who face financial emergencies and need immediate access to their funds. Two of the most significant proposals that have been recommended include: (1) significant broadening of the suspension of the 10 percent penalty tax on early withdrawals from IRAs and defined contribution plans, and (2) extending the temporary suspension of the penalty tax imposed on individuals age 70 1/2 or older who do not take required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain retirement plans.
Early withdrawal penalty
To discourage individuals from using money set aside in retirement accounts for expenses incurred outside of retirement, a 10 percent tax is imposed on the amount that is withdrawn, in addition to this amount being included in the individual's gross income and subject to federal (and often, state) income tax. The 10 percent penalty will not apply to distributions made in the following circumstances:
After the individual has reached age 59 1/2;
The distribution is made to an individual who is a beneficiary of a deceased IRA owner;
The individual is disabled;
For higher education expenses (from IRAs only);
The distributions are made as part of substantially equal payments over the account holder's life expectancy;
The individual retires after age 55;
For unreimbursed medical expenses exceeding 7.5 percent of the individual's adjusted gross income (AGI);
For medical insurance premiums in the case of unemployment;
To buy, build, or rebuild a first home (from IRAs only, and subject to a $10,000 withdrawal limit); and
If the individual is a reservist called to active duty after September 11, 2001.
Caution: The extent to which a withdrawal may be made from an employer-sponsored qualified retirement plan, even with respect to amounts that you contributed, depends upon what is allowed under the written plan itself. Some plans only allow you to withdraw after retirement. Others allow withdrawals for "hardships," which may include medical expenses or other financial crisis. Still other withdrawals, such as withdrawals for higher education or a first home purchase, are never allowed under IRS rules from an employer-sponsored plan.
The 10 percent penalty and, for that matter, the underlying taxable income generated from a withdrawal, do not apply if the funds are properly rolled over within a 60-day period from an employer-sponsored plan to an IRA or from one qualified plan or IRA to another.
Hardship withdrawals. Individuals who take a hardship withdrawal from their defined contribution plan must also pay the 10 percent penalty tax. A hardship is defined as an immediate and heavy financial need. Certain expenses are deemed to meet this definition, but even so, the penalty still applies.
Proposals to suspend the 10 percent penalty
Several proposals have been advanced by policymakers to eliminate or suspend the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty in certain situations. The proposals would generally add a paragraph to Internal Revenue Code Sec. 72(t) to eliminate the penalty in specific circumstances. Proposals include eliminating or suspending the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty for:
Public safety employees who retire before the age of 55;
Workers who are unemployed;
Individuals affected by natural disasters;
Homeowners at risk of having their mortgage foreclosed;
Individuals who receive a hardship distribution from a retirement plan; and
Individuals who have qualified adoption expenses.
RMDs
Individuals with certain qualified retirement plans, as well as traditional IRAs and 403(b) plans, are required to withdraw a certain amount ( a "required minimum distribution" or RMD) from the account each year after reaching age 70 1/2 (Roth IRAs are not subject to the RMD rules). The annual RMD is based on the account balance as of December 31 of the prior year and the account holder's life expectancy. Generally, RMDs must begin no later than April 1 of the year after you reach age 70 1/2.
Proposals to suspend RMDs
RMDs were suspended for 2009 only. RMDs must be taken for 2010 and beyond, unless Congress acts to suspend the RMD rules again. However policymakers have put forth various proposals to eliminate or suspend altogether the RMD requirements. The proposals include:
Suspending the RMD requirement through 2010;
Suspending the RMD requirement through 2012;
Eliminating the RMD requirement; or
Postponing the required starting date, which would raise the age at which individuals must start taking their RMDs.
When contemplating whether to implement any of these proposals, Congress and Treasury officials must balance a number of considerations, including the immediate financial needs of individuals with the policies behind the penalty taxes; namely, providing funds for retirement and not allowing the money to be used for pre-retirement expenses.
Our office will keep you posted on any legislative proposals that may affect your retirement planning. We also can help you navigate the current rules that would apply should you need to make a withdrawal soon from your retirement savings.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
People are buzzing about Roth Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Unlike traditional IRAs, "qualified" distributions from a Roth IRA are tax-free, provided they are held for five years and are made after age 59 1/2, death or disability. You can establish a Roth IRA just as you would a traditional IRA. You can also convert assets in a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.
People are buzzing about Roth Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Unlike traditional IRAs, "qualified" distributions from a Roth IRA are tax-free, provided they are held for five years and are made after age 59 1/2, death or disability. You can establish a Roth IRA just as you would a traditional IRA. You can also convert assets in a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.
Before 2010, only taxpayers with adjusted gross income of $100,000 or less were eligible to convert their traditional IRA (provided they were not married taxpayers filing separate returns). Beginning in 2010, anyone can convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, regardless of income level or filing status.
Comment: While you can only contribute a maximum of $5,000 to a Roth IRA for 2010 (plus a $1,000 catch-up contribution if you are over age 50), you can convert an unlimited amount from a traditional IRA.
Conversion is treated as a taxable distribution of assets from the traditional IRA to the IRA holder, although it is not subject to the 10 percent tax on early distributions. While paying taxes on conversion is undesirable, the advantages of holding assets in a Roth IRA usually outweigh this disadvantage, especially if you will not be retiring soon. Furthermore, if you convert assets in 2010, you have the option of including them in income in 2011 and 2012 (50 percent each year) instead of 2010.
Comment: Generally, this income-splitting would be advantageous to any taxpayer who does not expect a sharp increase in income in 2011 or 2012. A wildcard factor is that the lower income tax rates that have been in effect since 2001 will expire after 2010 and could increase in 2011.
There are four ways to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA:
A rollover - you receive a distribution from a traditional IRA and roll it over to a Roth IRA within 60 days;
Trustee-to-trustee transfer - you direct the trustee of the traditional IRA to transfer an amount to the trustee of a Roth IRA;
Same-trustee transfer - the trustee of the traditional IRA transfers assets to a Roth IRA maintained by the same trustee; or
Redesignation - you designate a traditional IRA as a Roth IRA, instead of opening a new Roth account.
Comment: The account holder does not have to convert all of the assets in the traditional IRA.
Another advantage of converting assets from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA is that you can change your mind and put the assets back into the traditional IRA. This is known as a recharacterization. You have until the due date, with extensions, for the return filed for the year of conversion. Thus, if you convert assets in 2010, you have until mid-October in 2011 to undo the conversion.
This ability to recharacterize the conversion allows you to use hindsight to check whether your assets declined in value after the conversion. Since you are paying taxes on the amount converted, a decline in asset value means that you paid taxes on phantom income that no longer exists. However, if you convert assets into multiple Roth IRAs, you can choose to recharacterize the assets in a Roth IRA that decreased in value, while maintaining the conversion for a Roth IRA's assets that appreciated in value.
The use of a Roth IRA can be a savvy investment, but whether to convert assets is not an easy decision. If you would like to explore your options, please contact this office.
If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose.
